RapidQ <-> FNX Conversion
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:43 pm
On the RQ forum there is talk about making a RQ <-> FNX conversion utility. My question is with FNX being rewritten should they wait or go ahead? Marco can you comment on this?
I can see several differences that are not compatible and have no way to make the conversion. For instance the TYPE construct - Completely different and incompatible. I hope Marco can make a better TYPE construct hint - hint. The RECORD construct is not a UDT construct so there is no conversion there.n FNX needs a good UDT implementation again hint - hint hehe :) I do like the idea of a record construct for reading data files. Handy :) Enough blubbering... Anybody have any thoughts?
I can see several differences that are not compatible and have no way to make the conversion. For instance the TYPE construct - Completely different and incompatible. I hope Marco can make a better TYPE construct hint - hint. The RECORD construct is not a UDT construct so there is no conversion there.n FNX needs a good UDT implementation again hint - hint hehe :) I do like the idea of a record construct for reading data files. Handy :) Enough blubbering... Anybody have any thoughts?